Read-only archive. The Real Salt Lake Forums ran from 2004 to 2008. Posting and logins are closed; everything is preserved as it was.
Real Salt Lake Forums
Fan discussion for Real Salt Lake · Salt Lake City, Utah · Est. 2004
Archive Mode
Read only · 2004–2008

Mathis (before engagement) LOL
819 views

Mathis (before engagement) LOL

Old 08-17-2005, 07:31 AM  #11
Site Supporter
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 347
All I can say is "WOW!"
Old 08-17-2005, 08:39 AM  #12
Zero-Two
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,432
Here is one of Mathis' better judgement photos
Attached Images
6747100004.jpg
__________________
AYL Soccer Site

My Photos on International Sports Images

Old 08-17-2005, 08:41 AM  #13
Zero-Two
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,432
or even this one... not my favorite but better than that the first one in this thread.
We actually had an entire thread on the pictures from the USMNT that inclyuded that picture and a very telling photo of Landy-cakes
Attached Images
6747100005.jpg
__________________
AYL Soccer Site

My Photos on International Sports Images

Old 08-17-2005, 09:00 AM  #14
Real Salt Lake Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: West Jordan, UT
Posts: 176
You know, they say REAL MEN WEAR PINK... do you think they meant REAL or ReAL? LOL
Quote:
Originally Posted by HibaIssa
Would you prefer pics like this instead? 😛

Old 08-17-2005, 09:04 AM  #15
Go Gunners!
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: West Jordan, Ut
Posts: 1,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by DizzyHolly
You know, they say REAL MEN WEAR PINK... do you think they meant REAL or ReAL? LOL
It can't be ReAL men because he is wearing a Dallas Burn Junior Dance Team t-shirt.
__________________
An empty stomach is not a good political advisor.
Old 08-17-2005, 09:10 AM  #16
Real Salt Lake Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Loch Ness
Posts: 1,650
No fair.

I want a Junior RSL Dance Team T-shirt. Or even better, a Late Twenties But Still Buying Clothes At Abercrombie and Fitch RSL Dance Team T-shirt.
Old 08-30-2005, 08:32 PM  #17
Zero-Two
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,432
Quote:
Originally Posted by montgjules
Where's the post-engagement pic?

Right here!
Attached Images
MathisSnowbird.jpg
__________________
AYL Soccer Site

My Photos on International Sports Images

Old 08-31-2005, 10:41 AM  #18
Site Supporter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: 10th floor, west facing deck, Denver
Posts: 1,564
Congrats to Clint. Too bad for the rest of us we can't see his fiance's ink a bit more. 🙂
Old 08-31-2005, 02:59 PM  #19
Real Salt Lake Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: El Pais del Equipo Chico
Posts: 1,699
Quote:
Last year a friend of mine upgraded from Girlfriend 4.0 to Wife 1.0 and found that it's a memory hog leaving few system resources for other applications. He is also now noticing the Wife 1.0 is also spawning Child-processes which are further consuming valuable resources. No mention of this particular phenomenon was included in the product documentation, though other users have informed me that this is to be expected due to the nature of the application.
Not only that, Wife 1.0 installs itself so that it is always launched at system initialization where it can monitor all other system activity. Some applications such as PokerNite 10.3 , Bachelor Party 2.5, and Pubnite 7.0 are no longer able to run on the system at all, causing the system to lockup when launched (even though the apps worked fine before).

Wife 1.0 provides no installation options. Thus, the installation of undesired plug-ins such as Mother-in-law 55.8 and the Brother-in-law Beta is unavoidable. Also, system performance seems to diminish with each passing day.

Some features my friend would like to see in the upcoming Wife 2.0:


A "don't remind me again" button.
Minimize button.
Ability to delete the "headache" file
An install feature that provides an option to uninstall 2.0 version without loss of other system resources.
An option to run the network driver in "promiscuous mode" allowing the the system's Hardware Probe feature to be much more useful/effective.


I myself wish I had decided to avoid all of the headaches associated with Wife 1.0 by sticking with Girlfriend 3.0 Even here, however, I have found many problems. Apparently you cannot install Girlfriend 4.0 on top of girlfriend 3.0. You must uninstall Girlfriend 3.0 first, otherwise the two versions of Girlfriend will have conflicts over shared use of the I/O port. Other users have told me that this is a long-standing problem that I should have been aware of. Guess that explains what happened to versions 1 and 2.

To make matters worse, the uninstall program for Girlfriend 3.0 doesn't work very well, leaving undesirable traces of the application in the system. Another identified problem is that all versions of Girlfriend have annoying little messages about the advantages of upgrading to Wife 1.0!

Seven characters.
Old 08-31-2005, 04:40 PM  #20
Real Salt Lake Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,462
Don't even get us women started on Husband 1.0.
 
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

All times are Mountain Time (US).


Originally powered by vBulletin® 3.6 and Gallery 2. Archived and restored as static pages in 2026.